A) Hawaii and Alaska
B) Louisiana and New York
C) Louisiana and California
D) Kentucky and Florida
E) North Carolina and Montana
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Harry is correct.
B) Harry is incorrect because while the statute of frauds would require his signature on the document, there is no requirement that the signature be at the end.
C) Harry is incorrect because the statute of frauds did not require his signature so long as the selling price was referenced.
D) Harry is incorrect because the statute of frauds did not require his signature so long as the type of subject matter involved was referenced.
E) Harry is incorrect because the statute of frauds did not require his signature so long as the parties were clearly identified.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Harry is correct.
B) Harry is incorrect because he is the one being sued, and he signed the document.
C) Harry is incorrect because the statute of frauds did not require her signature so long as the selling price was referenced.
D) Harry is incorrect because the statute of frauds did not require her signature so long as the type of subject matter involved was referenced.
E) Harry is incorrect because the statute of frauds did not require her signature so long as the parties were clearly identified.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Harry is correct.
B) Harry is incorrect because under the parol evidence rule, Rebecca, as the buyer, would be allowed to identify the subject matter in the event of a discrepancy.
C) Harry is incorrect because under the parol evidence rule, the judge would likely allow oral evidence regarding the house at issue in order to clarify an ambiguity.
D) Harry is incorrect because the parol evidence rule would not apply in situations involving an ambiguity.
E) Harry is incorrect because the parol evidence rule would not apply in the absence of a merger clause.
Correct Answer
verified
Essay
Correct Answer
verified
View Answer
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Complete
B) Merger
C) Adhesion
D) Bilateral
E) Acknowledged
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) The statement has no effect because of the statute of frauds.
B) The statement would be excluded from consideration as parol evidence but only because it involved an amount in excess of $5,000.
C) The judge would be estopped from considering the evidence.
D) The statement would be classified as an admission and would establish an exception to the statute of frauds involving the agreement on the house.
E) The statement would be excluded from consideration because of the collateral interest rule.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) The statute is intended to prevent oral claims to the existence of a contract for the sale of land.
B) The statute requires a writing as evidence of a contract to sell land.
C) A claim to an oral contract for the sale of land is not enough to prove a contract of sale existed.
D) Mortgages on land are within the statute of frauds.
E) No leases are within the statute of frauds.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Admission
B) Submission
C) Deposition
D) Interrogatory
E) Confirmation
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Admissions, partial performance, and promissory estoppel
B) Partial performance and admissions, but not promissory estoppel
C) Promissory estoppel but not admissions or partial performance
D) Promissory estoppel and partial performance, but not admissions
E) Admissions but not partial performance or promissory estoppel
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) The promises fall within the statute of frauds.
B) The promises do not fall within the statute of frauds because they involve material matters, not matters involving home and children.
C) The promises do not fall within the statute of frauds unless Sally can prove that she would not have married Bruce without the assurance of the Mercedes and the trip.
D) The promises fall within the statute of frauds unless Bruce can prove that Sally would have married him without the assurance of the Mercedes and the trip.
E) The promises would have fallen within the statute of frauds in earlier times in history, but would not fall within the statute of frauds in this day and time.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Words establishing penalties
B) Speech or words, specifically words outside the original writing
C) Oral speech as opposed to written words
D) Written words as opposed to oral speech
E) Signature required
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) The contract or memorandum needs only to state the price of the goods.
B) The contract or memorandum needs only to state the quality of the goods.
C) The contract or memorandum needs only to state the quantity to be sold.
D) The contract or memorandum needs to state the price of the goods and the quality of the goods, but not the quantity to be sold.
E) The contract or memorandum needs to state the price of the goods, the quality of the goods, and also the quantity to be sold.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) German law does not have a parol evidence rule.
B) France has a limited parol evidence rule.
C) The parol evidence rule in France does not apply to commercial contracts.
D) England requires that promises to pay for the debt of others be in writing.
E) England has significantly increased the number of contracts falling within the statute of frauds since the original act was passed.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) She was correct.
B) She was incorrect because while the UCC has a provision regarding writings for the sale of certain goods, that provision is not a part of the statute of frauds.
C) She was incorrect because the statute of frauds provision involving the sale of goods only applies to goods costing over $1,500.
D) She was incorrect because the statute of frauds provision involving the sale of goods only applies to goods costing over $2,000.
E) She was incorrect because the statute of frauds provision involving the sale of goods only applies to goods costing over $5,000.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) The primary-purpose rule
B) The resulting-fact rule
C) The main-purpose rule
D) The delineated rule
E) The personal-obligation standard
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) That the contract was enforceable because agreements for professional services do not come within the protection of the statute of frauds.
B) That the contract was enforceable because of the partial-performance exception to the statute of frauds.
C) That the contract was not in writing and, therefore, could not be enforced.
D) That the contract could not be enforced because of the parol evidence rule.
E) That the contract could be enforced because of the parol evidence rule.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Substantial performance
B) Partial performance
C) Sales substantiation
D) The purchase proof rule
E) The sales proof rule
Correct Answer
verified
Showing 41 - 60 of 65
Related Exams