A) Compounded
B) Defamation
C) Absolute
D) Simple
E) Complex
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Samantha has committed both defamation and invasion of privacy toward the college president.
B) Samantha has not committed any tort.
C) Samantha has committed defamation of the college president in the form of slander.
D) Samantha has appropriated the photograph for commercial gain,which constitutes an invasion of privacy.
E) Samantha has committed defamation of the college president in the form of libel.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Intentional infliction of strict-liability distress.
B) Intentional infliction of emotional distress.
C) Negligent infliction of emotional distress.
D) Reckless invasion of solitude.
E) Psychological infliction of distress.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Compensatory
B) Punitive
C) Retaliatory
D) Revenge
E) Nominal
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Slander of quality
B) Slander of title
C) Trade libel
D) Libel of sale
E) Libel of title
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) By shoving her in the back,Daniel committed a battery.
B) Daniel did not commit any torts because he can rely on the self-defense theory.
C) By shoving her in the back,Daniel committed a battery and an assault.
D) By shoving her in the back,Daniel committed an assault.
E) Daniel did not commit any torts because he did not actually physically harm Min-ji.
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Private nuisance.
B) Trespass to property.
C) Negligence.
D) Harassment.
E) Conversion.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Yes,because assault only requires apprehension regardless of whether it is reasonable.
B) No,because assault requires unwanted physical contact.
C) Yes,because it is necessary to take a person's level of fear into account when interacting with that person.
D) Yes,because assault is judged on the basis of the victim's level of apprehension only.
E) No,because assault requires reasonable apprehension.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) A defendant commits a negligence tort when he accidentally engages in a criminal act and someone is hurt.
B) A defendant commits a negligence tort when he is careless to someone else's detriment.
C) A defendant commits a negligence tort when he forms intent to cause harm but causes a different type of harm.
D) A defendant commits a negligence tort when he subjects someone to a reasonable risk of harm.
E) A defendant commits a negligence tort only if he commits an inherently dangerous action which can never be safe.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) No,because the story was made up and unlikely to be believed.
B) No,because politicians cannot be defamed.
C) No,because the candidate for president is a public figure.
D) Yes,because the reporter acted with actual malice.
E) No,because having an affair would not harm the reputation of a presidential candidate.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Austin has committed both an assault and a battery.
B) Austin cannot rely on self-defense because he was involved in the argument and not completely innocent.
C) Austin cannot rely upon self-defense because his life was not in danger.
D) Austin has not committed an assault or a battery because he acted in self-defense.
E) Austin has committed a battery.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) The court dismissed the lawsuit on the basis that the statements were not false but also recognized that the only proof justifying application of the libel-proof doctrine is proof that a defendant has been sentenced to death.
B) The court allowed the lawsuit to proceed,ruling that whether the plaintiff already had a bad reputation was irrelevant in relation to a defamation lawsuit.
C) The court dismissed the lawsuit,recognizing that the facts fit within the jurisdiction's description of when the libel-proof doctrine might apply based upon the plaintiff's already bad reputation.
D) The court allowed the lawsuit to proceed,ruling that whether the plaintiff already had a bad reputation was irrelevant in relation to the libel lawsuit involved,although the plaintiff's reputation would likely have barred an action for slander.
E) The court allowed the lawsuit to proceed,ruling that whether the plaintiff already had a bad reputation was irrelevant in relation to the slander lawsuit involved,although the plaintiff's reputation would likely have barred an action for libel.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) To compensate innocent persons who are injured.
B) To allow a remedy for breach of contract claims.
C) To impose criminal penalties on those who commit wrongdoing.
D) To encourage vigilante justice.
E) To allow prosecutors to protect the vulnerable.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Compensatory damages
B) Accrual damages
C) Punitive damages
D) Perspective damages
E) Nominal damages
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Conversion.
B) Trespass to personal property.
C) Harassment.
D) Negligence.
E) Private nuisance.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Need and truth.
B) Privilege but not truth.
C) Need,truth and privilege.
D) Truth but not privilege.
E) Truth and privilege.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Only that the statements were made in Parliament.
B) Only that the statements were true.
C) Only that the statements were made in court.
D) That the statements were not made in Parliament or court.
E) That the statements were true,that the statements were made in Parliament,or that the statements were made in court.
Correct Answer
verified
Showing 61 - 80 of 90
Related Exams